Unreal Lip + Cheek Glow Blush Stick Peachy Glow dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.7 (856)·Peach · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: stick
Differences: Apricot rather than peach· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Apricot rather than peach · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: stick
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Coral rather than peach· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Coral rather than peach · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Virtue, against Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Lip + Cheek Glow Blush Stick in Peachy Glow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeachy GlowClosest shade matchVirtueHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%89#e97c6b#e57f67Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall78
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared35
Longevity50%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ulta Beauty Collection Too Cheeky Lip & Cheek Color Stick in Moment, against Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Lip + Cheek Glow Blush Stick in Peachy Glow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeachy GlowClosest overall alternativeMomentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%88#e97c6b#e97162Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$27 less (61%)
