Unreal Lip + Cheek Glow Blush Stick Pinky Glow dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.7 (856)·Pink · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim comfort
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (43%)4.7 (16,236)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stain rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stain rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
36
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: stick
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: soft rose glow / golden taupe contour
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stain rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stain rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$33 less (75%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
37
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: electric pink / violet fuschia
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Kosas Blush is Life Baked Talc-Free Dimensional + Brightening Blush in Butterflies, against Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Lip + Cheek Glow Blush Stick in Pinky Glow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePinky GlowClosest matchButterfliesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour55%98#f36195#f36494Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumLightCloseDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Combination, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.