Unreal Lip + Cheek Glow Blush Stick Pretty Glow dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.7 (856)·Mauve · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: natural rose / light to tan with cool undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: soft rose glow / golden taupe contour
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stain rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stain rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Plum rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Plum rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
20
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
35
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: A powdery pink mauve with golden shimmer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Natasha Denona Hy-Blush Cloudy Cream Cheek Duo in Lush Lila, against Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Lip + Cheek Glow Blush Stick in Pretty Glow. Matched on the deeper blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePretty GlowClosest matchLush LilaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%71#d575a6#e26eb9Close colourColour difference 4.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall88
Finish50%100DewyDewySameSame dewy finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%7024-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 24-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$36 less (82%)
