All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow Day Into Date dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.3 (650)
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Compared using the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade
79
overall
Shade match82
$34Sephora$1 less (3%)4.6 (4,359)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Mocha Sparkle, against Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Day Into Date. Matched on the lighter eyeshadow pan, against the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDay Into DateClosest shade matchMocha SparkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#cfaf98#d2b49cVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Finish65%68ShimmerGlitterSome differenceGlitter finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Bite Size Eyeshadow Palette in I Love You A Latte, against Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Day Into Date. Matched on pan 1, against the lighter eyeshadow pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDay Into DateClosest overall alternativeI Love You A LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#cfaf98#d1b195Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.