All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow Seashell Pink/Fawn Satin New dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.3 (650)
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Compared using the Fawn Satin New pan of your shade
82
overall
Shade match87
$34Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (3%)4.5 (4,815)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Purple rather than plum· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than plum · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan, against the Fawn Satin New pan of your shade
79
overall
Shade match89
$43SephoraCosts $8 more4.8 (1,679)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering medium pink / a blackened cherry
Compared using the Fawn Satin New pan of your shade
78
overall
Shade match78
$34Sephora$1 less (3%)4.5 (4,815)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shimmering soft mauve with hidden pearl
Compared using the Seashell Pink pan of your shade
75
overall
Shade match73
$34Sephora$1 less (3%)4.5 (4,815)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Stick rather than powder (format)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Compared using the Seashell Pink pan of your shade
75
overall
Shade match72
$34Sephora$1 less (3%)4.5 (4,815)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Compared using the Fawn Satin New pan of your shade
73
overall
Shade match73
$32Sephora$3 less (9%)4.3 (372)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Purple rather than plum· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than plum · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Ballerina, against Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Seashell Pink/Fawn Satin New. Compared using the Seashell Pink pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSeashell Pink/Fawn Satin NewClosest shade matchBallerinaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#ccaba6#cdada8Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0SensitiveDryDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 84/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in Naked Lunch, against Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Seashell Pink/Fawn Satin New. Compared using the Seashell Pink pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSeashell Pink/Fawn Satin NewClosest overall alternativeNaked LunchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#ccaba6#d1a99eVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.