All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow Twilight Mauve/Brandied dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.3 (650)
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matched on pan 1, against the Twilight Mauve pan of your shade
71
overall
Shade match63
$42SephoraCosts $7 more4.0 (616)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than purple· Stick rather than powder (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Compared using the Twilight Mauve pan of your shade
67
overall
Shade match64
$7Ulta Beauty$28 less (80%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
Matched on pan 2, against the Twilight Mauve pan of your shade
67
overall
Shade match56
$28Sephora$7 less (20%)4.5 (1,880)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Matched on pan 2, against the Twilight Mauve pan of your shade
67
overall
Shade match55
$28Sephora$7 less (20%)4.5 (1,880)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than mauve· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than mauve · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matched on the Lucent pan, against the Twilight Mauve pan of your shade
66
overall
Shade match53
$48Ulta BeautyCosts $13 more4.8 (1,549)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than mauve· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than mauve · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Compared using the Twilight Mauve pan of your shade
65
overall
Shade match65
$22Sephora$13 less (37%)4.5 (377)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in LILAC PEARL, against Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Twilight Mauve/Brandied. Compared using the Twilight Mauve pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTwilight Mauve/BrandiedClosest shade matchLILAC PEARLHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%97#ceb3bc#ceb1bbLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared0
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%0SensitiveNormal, CombinationDifferentMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 77/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in Going Steady, against Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Twilight Mauve/Brandied. Matched on pan 3, against the Brandied pan of your shade. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTwilight Mauve/BrandiedClosest overall alternativeGoing SteadyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%59#a996a9#c3a3baSlight colour differenceColour difference 6.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%75MediumLightSome differenceDepth difference 8.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.