All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow Angel Eyes dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.2 (445)·Purple · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: vibrant purple with silver, blue, violet and pink sparkle
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Sold as blush, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Brown rather than purple· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
20
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than purple · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Dry rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than purple · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Claims comfort· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than purple· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than purple · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than purple· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than purple · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (37%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Aurora, against Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in Angel Eyes. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAngel EyesClosest shade matchAuroraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%68#cb91ae#cba1bfSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in Going Steady, against Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in Angel Eyes. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAngel EyesClosest overall alternativeGoing SteadyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall70
Colour60%54#cb91ae#c3a3baSlight colour differenceColour difference 7.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87LightLightSameDepth difference 5.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 70/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.