All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow Foxier dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.2 (445)·Taupe · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal rather than sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: cool-toned taupe with silver shimmer
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (67%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Grey rather than taupe· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Grey rather than taupe · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Cream rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than taupe· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than taupe · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Claims comfort· Same skin types: sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Green rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
24
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Taupe Dollar, against Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in Foxier. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFoxierClosest shade matchTaupe DollarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#876a5a#8f6859Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall88
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 66/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Ivory Bisque/Bronze Satin New, against Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in Foxier. Matched on the Bronze Satin New pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFoxierClosest overall alternativeIvory Bisque/Bronze Satin NewHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%97#876a5a#896a58Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.