All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow Sugar Cane dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.2 (445)·White · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Silver rather than white· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than white · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Normal, Combination rather than sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sheer white with prismatic pearls
CoverGirl TruNaked Eyeshadow Palette in That's Rad, against Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in Sugar Cane. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSugar CaneClosest shade matchThat's RadHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#e6dfd9#eae3dbLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared35
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableSensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique All About Shadow Duo Eyeshadow in Ivory Bisque/Bronze Satin New, against Clinique All About Shadow Single Eyeshadow in Sugar Cane. Matched on the Ivory Bisque pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSugar CaneClosest overall alternativeIvory Bisque/Bronze Satin NewHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%65#e6dfd9#e9d5caSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100WhiteWhiteSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%100SensitiveSensitiveSameBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.