Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser CN 116 Spice dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.0 (1,308)·Medium tan · Neutral · neutral pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (cool vs neutral)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Satin rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Satin rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: deep with rosy cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin w/ very warm undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$6.01 less (27%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.01 less (41%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.01 less (23%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ warm undertones
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$6.01 less (27%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.01 less (41%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
$16.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.01 less (23%)4.4 (832)
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser CN 116 Spice (Medium tan · Neutral · neutral pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Infallible Full Wear Waterproof Concealer in 405 Toffee, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 116 Spice. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCN 116 SpiceClosest shade match405 ToffeeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%96#ca8a5b#c98a57Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared55
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 73/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 11, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 116 Spice. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCN 116 SpiceClosest overall alternative11How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%98#ca8a5b#cc8b59Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $20 more
