Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 46 Golden Neutral dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.0 (1,308)·Fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm, golden undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.01 less (41%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin w/ warm olive undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.01 less (41%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
51
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for normal/dry/oily skin
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (64%)4.2 (5,664)
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with golden undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than neutral undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than neutral undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium tan with olive undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 46 Golden Neutral (Fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Light 2, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 46 Golden Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 46 Golden NeutralClosest matchLight 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#efc795#f4c897Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.1
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared70
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared82
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Normal, dry, oilyNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $20 more
