Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 125 Mahogany dupes and alternatives Clinique
4.0 (1,308)·Deep tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ neutral undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.01 less (41%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$9.01 less (41%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Luminous rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: for dark warm skin with golden undertones
The closest shade to Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser WN 125 Mahogany (Deep tan · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 43.0 Deep Honey, against Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in WN 125 Mahogany. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWN 125 MahoganyClosest match43.0 Deep HoneyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%95#9e7059#a16e55Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 84/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $20 more
