Hydrating Blush Stix Dream State dupes and alternatives ColourPop
4.5 (1,422)·Mauve · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Plum rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Powder rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than mauve· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than mauve · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
R.E.M. Beauty Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick in Off Book, against ColourPop Hydrating Blush Stix in Dream State. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDream StateClosest matchOff BookHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%96#9c4354#9c4857Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall63
Finish50%25ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Overall match 80/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $20 more
