Hydrating Blush Stix Whimsy dupes and alternatives ColourPop
4.5 (1,422)·Peach · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm coral with golden shimmer
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than peach· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than peach · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than peach· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than peach · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A vibrant pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Coral rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Coral rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Liquid rather than stick (format)· Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than peach· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than peach · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Berry rather than peach· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Berry rather than peach · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than peach· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than peach · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than peach· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than peach · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
DIBS Beauty Duet Baked Blush Duo in Pop Star, against ColourPop Hydrating Blush Stix in Whimsy. Matched on the deeper blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWhimsyClosest matchPop StarHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%89#d86f6d#e2686cVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 79/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $32 more
