Hydrating Blush Stix Love to See It dupes and alternatives ColourPop
4.5 (1,422)·Rose · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
95
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: stick· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
MERIT Flush Balm Cream Blush in Archival, against ColourPop Hydrating Blush Stix in Love to See It. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLove to See ItClosest matchArchivalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%98#bc6762#bb6864Looks identicalColour difference 0.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%60Combination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNormal, Dry, CombinationSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, dry, normal skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $9 more
