Super Shock Shadow Moonwalk dupes and alternatives ColourPop
4.5 (2,019)·Terracotta · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Green rather than terracotta· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Green rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than terracotta· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than terracotta· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than terracotta· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than terracotta· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Bronze rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: warm bronze with silver, gold and copper sparkle
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than terracotta· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than terracotta · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: sparkling gold with multi-colored pearl
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: maple sparkle, sunset sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
28
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than terracotta · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 116 Glitter Fever, against ColourPop Super Shock Shadow in Moonwalk. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMoonwalkClosest shade match116 Glitter FeverHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall68
Colour60%75#97813b#8d773cClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87MediumMediumSameDepth difference 5.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 73/100Shade match 68/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $19 more
