Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than purple· Holographic rather than pearl (shimmer)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than purple · Holographic rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Holographic rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Holographic rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than purple· Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than purple · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than purple· Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than purple · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than purple · Holographic rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than purple · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than purple · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Glitter rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · High shine
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Glitter rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Shimmer rather than pearl (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Retailer shade note: transparent pink, custom to your PH
CoverGirl Clean Fresh Yummy Lip Gloss in Laugh-vender, against Dior Lip Glow Butter Hydrating Gloss Balm in 102 Glazed Lavender. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade102 Glazed LavenderClosest shade matchLaugh-venderHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall87
Colour55%78#efcce7#f2c1e1Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared89
Shine40%89ShimmerSheer tintCloseLess shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedTintedNot listed for eitherA transparency not listed for one product
Shimmer25%—not comparablePearlNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall100
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Overall match 82/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Juicy Tubes Original Lip Gloss in 20 Lavender Latte, against Dior Lip Glow Butter Hydrating Gloss Balm in 102 Glazed Lavender. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade102 Glazed LavenderClosest overall alternative20 Lavender LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall81
Colour55%73#efcce7#dbbbdaClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%74LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 8.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared90
Shine40%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shine level
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedTintedNot listed for eitherA transparency not listed for one product
Shimmer25%75PearlGlitterSome differenceGlitter rather than pearl
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity100%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a non-sticky feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.