Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip gloss overall: shade match 50%, finish and visual result 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 10%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip gloss on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same shine: shimmer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim non-sticky
Retailer shade note: sheer terracotta with gold pearl
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Does not claim non-sticky
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Both claim non-sticky· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Pearl rather than shimmer (shimmer) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: midtone brown with rose gold and bronze pearl
Matches: Same shine: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim non-sticky
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Holographic rather than shimmer (shimmer)
Retailer shade note: shimmering holographic rich brown
Anastasia Beverly Hills Kiss Theory Hydrating Glossy Shine Lip Balm in Gingerline, against Dior Lip Glow Butter Hydrating Gloss Balm in 103 Toffee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade103 ToffeeClosest shade matchGingerlineHow they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall87
Colour55%87#9d4b40#9a514aVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 3 compared78
Shine40%78ShimmerHigh shineCloseMore shine
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%—not comparableShimmerNot listedNot listed for eitherShimmer not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity100%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability10% of overall100
Non-sticky50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a non-sticky feel
Overall match 79/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Phantom Volumizing Glossy Lip Balm in Trace 105, against Dior Lip Glow Butter Hydrating Gloss Balm in 103 Toffee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade103 ToffeeClosest overall alternativeTrace 105How they compareScore
Shade match50% of overall84
Colour55%83#9d4b40#9f4e3aClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Shine40%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shine level
Transparency35%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a transparency
Shimmer25%100ShimmerShimmerSameBoth shimmer
Wear & performance15% of overall100
Longevity100%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Comfort & suitability10% of overall70
Non-sticky50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a non-sticky feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 89/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$17 less (40%)
