Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than pink · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
→Strawberry Latte - Strawberry Fizz, Rose Chai, Latte, Pink Espresso
72
overall
Shade match85
$45SephoraCosts $35 more4.6 (1,018)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a delicious blend of creamy mauve, warm rose, and rich espresso tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than pink· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
ONE/SIZE Cheek Clapper 3D Blush Trio Palette in Phat Ass, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Blush Beauty Wand in Pink-Me-Up. Matched on the blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink-Me-UpClosest shade matchPhat AssHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour55%82#b25553#c04c52Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall71
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Valentino Liquirosso 2 in 1 Soft Matte Liquid Lipstick & Blush in 100R - Roman Grace, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Blush Beauty Wand in Pink-Me-Up. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePink-Me-UpClosest overall alternative100R - Roman GraceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%71#b25553#a65e61Close colourColour difference 4.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall89
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.