Halo Glow Blush Beauty Wand You Go Cocoa dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (30,063)·Terracotta · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Berry rather than terracotta· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than terracotta· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: rich berry / deep with warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: deep burnt rose (dream blur matte)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Coco-Loco, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Blush Beauty Wand in You Go Cocoa. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeYou Go CocoaClosest matchCoco-LocoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%84#652216#581e0eClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall84
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Overall match 80/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $17 more
