Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than other· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than other · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Bronze rather than other· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than other · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than other· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than other · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Golden rather than other· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Golden rather than other · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than other· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than other · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than other· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than other · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than other
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than other · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than other· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than other · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than other
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than other · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than other· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Visibly different colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than other · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than other· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than other · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than other· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than other · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than other
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than other · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Terracotta rather than other
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Terracotta rather than other · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown / nude rather than other· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown / nude rather than other · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Fenty Beauty Cheeks Out Freestyle Cream Blush in 10 Rosé Latte, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Blush Beauty Wand in Magic Hour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMagic HourClosest shade match10 Rosé LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour55%79#915230#8e5039Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 70/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Latte, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Halo Glow Blush Beauty Wand in Magic Hour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMagic HourClosest overall alternativeLatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour55%78#915230#934e36Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkLightCloseDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 70/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $16 more
