Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Beige dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Light · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
67
Close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral/pink undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin w/ warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium skin w/ warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium skin w/ very warm undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: medium fair, cool-neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than satin finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than satin finish· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 28% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than satin finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Beige (Light · Neutral undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Rare Beauty Liquid Touch Brightening Concealer in 270N, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium BeigeClosest match270NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#f0b78d#ebb88fLooks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference: 0.3
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 90/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $22 more
View at Target
