Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Peach dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Light · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with warm peach undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than satin finish· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
33
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light medium skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than satin finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than satin finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Retailer shade note: M1.5 - Medium with warm undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Medium Peach (Light · Warm · peach undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 34S medium sand, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium PeachClosest shade match34S medium sandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#efbe99#e9bb96Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference: 2.0
Retailer descriptionMedium lightMediumSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared60
Finish35%34SatinMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than satin
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, combination, normalNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for combination/normal skin
Overall match 82/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Glossier Stretch Concealer for Dewy Buildable Coverage in Medium 2, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Medium Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium PeachClosest overall alternativeMedium 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%83#efbe99#f6c495Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightFairCloseDepth difference: 2.9
Retailer descriptionMedium lightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared79
Finish35%78SatinRadiantCloseRadiant finish rather than satin
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Dry, combination, normalNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $30 more
