Putty Blush Bahamas dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (15,907)·Apricot · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than apricot· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than apricot · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Deeper· Coral rather than apricot· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Coral rather than apricot · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than apricot· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than apricot · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than apricot· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
90
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than apricot · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than apricot· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than apricot · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Deeper· Coral rather than apricot· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Coral rather than apricot · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than apricot· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than apricot · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Armani Beauty Dolci Blush Smoothing Cream-to-Powder Soft-Matte Balm in 3, Apricot Blush, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Putty Blush in Bahamas. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBahamasClosest shade match3, Apricot BlushHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%92#f88b6c#fe8562Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 78/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Live Tinted Huebeam Gradient Blushing Bronzer in Sonoran Sunrise, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Putty Blush in Bahamas. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBahamasClosest overall alternativeSonoran SunriseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall77
Colour55%77#f88b6c#ea937cClose colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 79/100Shade match 77/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $36 more
