Putty Blush Tahiti dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (15,907)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: cream
Differences: Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Pomelo Peach, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Putty Blush in Tahiti. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTahitiClosest matchPomelo PeachHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%92#e57371#e0756dVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $34 more
