Putty Blush Caribbean dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.5 (15,907)·Berry · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than berry· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than berry · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same format: cream
Differences: Rose rather than berry· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than berry · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than berry· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than berry · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Rose rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than berry· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than berry · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than berry· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than berry · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than berry· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
89
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than berry · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format: cream· Claims hydration
Differences: Rose rather than berry· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than berry · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: raspberry mauve / tan to deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim comfort· Claims hydration· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than berry· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than berry · Powder rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than berry· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than berry · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Pink rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 10-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Very close colour· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than berry· Metallic rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
41
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Metallic · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than berry · Metallic rather than natural (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Natasha Denona Hy-Blush Cloudy Cream Cheek Duo in Vamped, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Putty Blush in Caribbean. Matched on the deeper blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCaribbeanClosest matchVampedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%87#bb4457#c54353Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 80/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.