Double Wear Stay-in-Place Matte Powder Foundation 3W2 Cashew dupes and alternatives Estée Lauder
4.1 (305)·Fair · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$39.01 less (75%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$39.01 less (75%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: warm nude with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
84
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: buff beige with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$30 less (58%)3.5 (42)
Natural · Buildable coverage
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium light with golden undertones
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Slightly deeper· Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same olive undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$28 less (54%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$50Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (4%)4.3 (1,131)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: M1 - Medium with warm undertones, and a golden tone
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Luminous rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
37
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Luminous · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Luminous rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
25
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Matte Powder Foundation 3W2 Cashew (Fair · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 10 Light Warm, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Matte Powder Foundation in 3W2 Cashew. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3W2 CashewClosest shade match10 Light WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%90#fbcd99#f7c799Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96FairFairSameDepth difference: 2.6
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 85/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Juvia's Place I Am Magic Velvety Matte Foundation in 550 Martinique, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Matte Powder Foundation in 3W2 Cashew. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3W2 CashewClosest overall alternative550 MartiniqueHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%91#fbcd99#f3c48eVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90FairFairSameDepth difference: 4.5
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 88/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$36.01 less (69%)
