Futurist Skin Tint Serum Foundation SPF 20 7N2 Rich Amber dupes and alternatives Estée Lauder
4.3 (1,998)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: mid deep to rich - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
87
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep rich with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
87
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
43
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination skin · No SPF
Matches: Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
76
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: rich brown with pink undertones
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with cool brown undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$8 less (24%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Extra deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
76
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
87
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep rich with cool undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
87
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · No SPF
Retailer shade note: dark deep to rich - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 8-hour wear
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
42
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · No SPF
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: deep-rich with a red undertone
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Futurist Skin Tint Serum Foundation SPF 20 7N2 Rich Amber (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Dior Forever Skin Perfect 24H Multi-Use Foundation Stick in 9 N Neutral, against Estée Lauder Futurist Skin Tint Serum Foundation SPF 20 in 7N2 Rich Amber. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7N2 Rich AmberClosest shade match9 N NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#511e13#4e2216Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared62
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%80LightBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared31
Longevity30%208-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall40
Skin type100%40Normal, combinationNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Waterproof Foundation in 7N1 Java, against Estée Lauder Futurist Skin Tint Serum Foundation SPF 20 in 7N2 Rich Amber. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade7N2 Rich AmberClosest overall alternative7N1 JavaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%91#511e13#501b0aVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.