Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 16 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.3 (1,119)·Tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium deep with warm neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
75
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (3%)4.3 (6,833)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium shade with neutral-to-warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
67
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium dark with warm gold undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: golden caramel - brown skin with golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium tan, neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
52
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Medium deep shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Full rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (65%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Golden Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: tanned caramel with golden undertone for medium to dark skin
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (65%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: MD5.5 - Medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with neutral undertones
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (28%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
53
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Medium/Tan with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same light coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium deep with olive undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 16 (Tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 48 Medium, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 16. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade16Closest shade match48 MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%96#b37b4c#af7a4fLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80LightBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall67
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon PhotoReady Lift & Fill Skin Tint in 150 Medium Deep, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 16. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade16Closest overall alternative150 Medium DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%97#b37b4c#b57d4bLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.1
Retailer descriptionMediumNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared75
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.