Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 25 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.3 (1,119)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim colour stability
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral red undertones
Differences: Slightly deeper · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same light coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$24.01 less (60%)4.2 (324)
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Colour not compared · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Differences: Slightly deeper · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)4.3 (340)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Same light coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep skin with yellow undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep complexion with neutral undertones
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)4.3 (340)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
73
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 25 (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Beautiful Skin Medium Coverage Foundation in 17 Neutral, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 25. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade25Closest shade match17 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%86#664c3e#644535Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall49
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, combinationSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Too Faced Born This Way Undetectable Medium-To-Full Coverage Foundation in Ganache, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 25. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade25Closest overall alternativeGanacheHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%71#664c3e#674231Close colourColour difference 4.8 (0 is identical)
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, drySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.