Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 19 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.3 (1,119)·Tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: MD3.3 - Medium-deep to deep with warm undertones, and a red tone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: golden caramel - brown skin with golden undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (38%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium deep with olive undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for darker tan skin with golden neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No blurring effect claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: M5.25 - medium-deep to deep with neutral undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same natural finish· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: MD4 - medium-deep to deep with warm undertones, and an olive tone
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: Medium Deep to Deep - Neutral with warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim colour stability
Retailer shade note: caramel - brown skin with neutral undertones
$22Ulta Beauty(product price)$18 less (45%)3.5 (42)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Buildable rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Buildable rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick 19 (Tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Maracuja Juicy Glow Tint in 42S Tan Sand, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 19. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade19Closest shade match42S Tan SandHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#c27127#b77336Very close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.2
Retailer descriptionMedium tanTanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80LightMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall49
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 19, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Blur + Smooth Foundation Stick in 19. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade19Closest overall alternative19How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#c27127#b47434Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.4
Retailer descriptionMedium tanMedium tanBoth described as medium tanThe retailers describe the same depth
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall52
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims colour stability (no oxidation); the match does not list it
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$2 less (5%)
