Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than golden· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than golden · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than golden· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (35%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Terracotta rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
26
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Terracotta rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than golden· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
21
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than golden · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
26
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (65%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Peach rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
24
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Peach rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
14
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than golden · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (42%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Glitter rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
13
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in If It Ain't Baroque, against Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Gold Hoopz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGold HoopzClosest shade matchIf It Ain't BaroqueHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%63#d39619#dea04cSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86LightLightSameDepth difference 5.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall25
Finish65%0MatteGlitterDifferentGlitter finish rather than matte
Overall match 59/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rabanne Colorshot Metallic Liquid Eyeshadow in 79 Cosmic Rave, against Fenty Beauty Shadowstix Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Gold Hoopz. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGold HoopzClosest overall alternative79 Cosmic RaveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%66#d39619#be8607Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%73LightMediumSome differenceDepth difference 9.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall30
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Overall match 61/100Shade match 76/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.