Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Medium 3 dupes and alternatives Glossier
4.1 (490)·Light medium · Warm · golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: for medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim 12-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
89
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for light to medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Light rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Light rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: medium with warm golden undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for darker medium skin with warm olive undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
0
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Olive rather than warm undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Olive rather than warm undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: tanned amber for olive skin tones
The closest shade to Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage Medium 3 (Light medium · Warm · golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Haleys Beauty Re-form Luminous Skin Foundation in 4.30 Medium - Warm, against Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Medium 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium 3Closest shade match4.30 Medium - WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#dfaa63#dead72Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalRadiantSome differenceRadiant finish rather than natural
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100SensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 85/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Yepoda The Dewy Day in 3W, against Glossier Stretch Fluid Foundation for Buildable Coverage in Medium 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMedium 3Closest overall alternative3WHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%78#dfaa63#e7b47aClose colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall73
Skin type100%73SensitiveNormal, dry, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $6 more
Walmart
Target
