Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica Dragon Fruit Daze dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
4.6 (1,141)·Pink · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (66%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: candy pink with cool undertones
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Too Faced Cloud Crush Blurring Powder Blush in Super Candy Clouds, against Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Dragon Fruit Daze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDragon Fruit DazeClosest shade matchSuper Candy CloudsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%95#f46ca6#f072aaLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall77
Finish50%89NaturalSatinCloseSatin finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kosas Blush is Life Baked Talc-Free Dimensional + Brightening Blush in Butterflies, against Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Dragon Fruit Daze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDragon Fruit DazeClosest overall alternativeButterfliesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%79#f46ca6#f36494Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumLightCloseDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Combination, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.