Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica Pomelo Peach dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
4.6 (1,141)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same format: powder
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm coral with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than coral · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than coral · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Putty Blush in Tahiti, against Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Pomelo Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePomelo PeachClosest shade matchTahitiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%92#e0756d#e57371Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
R.E.M. Beauty Eclipse Cheek & Lip Stick in AAAND SCENE, against Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Pomelo Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePomelo PeachClosest overall alternativeAAAND SCENEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#e0756d#e06c63Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$7 less (22%)
