Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica Hibiscus Haze dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
4.6 (1,141)·Pink · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Coral rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Coral rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: muted pink - mauve / deep plum
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Valentino Liquirosso 2 in 1 Soft Matte Liquid Lipstick & Blush in 128R - Nude At Last, against Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Hibiscus Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHibiscus HazeClosest shade match128R - Nude At LastHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%83#cc5c6c#c3556bClose colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall60
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 80/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Gucci Glow Dewy Powder Blush in 04 - Bright Pink, against Haus Labs Color Fuse Talc-Free Blush Powder With Fermented Arnica in Hibiscus Haze. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHibiscus HazeClosest overall alternative04 - Bright PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%86#cc5c6c#db5c6fVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60CoolNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $17 more
