Power Sculpt Velvet Talc-Free Powder Bronzer Acacia Ember Medium Deep dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
4.4 (532)·Rose · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm undertone, natural finish for medium to tan skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than rose · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder· Same skin types: normal, dry, oily
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than rose· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Looks identical · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than rose · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (possible)
Retailer shade note: deep with cool bronzer and cool contour
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: deep bronze with golden undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than rose · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Does not claim comfort· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: natural matte finish for medium-dark to dark skin tones
NYX Professional Makeup Buttermelt Pressed Powder Natural Finish Bronzer in Butta'd Down, against Haus Labs Power Sculpt Velvet Talc-Free Powder Bronzer in Acacia Ember Medium Deep. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAcacia Ember Medium DeepClosest matchButta'd DownHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour55%91#8d5441#965742Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth25%95Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 90/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$27 less (71%)
Sephora
