Power Sculpt Velvet Talc-Free Powder Bronzer Bronzed Umber Light dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
4.4 (532)·Rose · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Medium to tan with warm golden undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than rose· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than rose · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Bronze rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Bronze rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: warm golden undertone, natural finish for medium skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Golden rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: medium to tan with a neutral golden undertone
Saie Dew Bronze Soft-Focus Sculpting Liquid Bronzer in Stinson, against Haus Labs Power Sculpt Velvet Talc-Free Powder Bronzer in Bronzed Umber Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBronzed Umber LightClosest shade matchStinsonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%96#a46e54#a46f58Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%28Normal, Dry, OilyNormal, Combination, SensitiveDifferentBoth marketed for normal skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Matte Bronzer in Refill Tan, against Haus Labs Power Sculpt Velvet Talc-Free Powder Bronzer in Bronzed Umber Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBronzed Umber LightClosest overall alternativeRefill TanHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%90#a46e54#9d6a54Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth25%96MediumDeep / darkCloseDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 87/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$8 less (21%)
