Power Sculpt Velvet Talc-Free Powder Bronzer Amber Horizon Medium dupes and alternatives Haus Labs
4.4 (532)·Golden · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar bronzer overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar bronzer on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: medium bronze with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sold as contour, rated here for use as bronzer (suited)
Retailer shade note: light to medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
35
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: deep-very deep bronze with wam red undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: Tan to deep with warm undertones
Differences: Lighter· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Bronze rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: tan to rich with warm red, slightly neutral undertones
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: medium-deep to deep with golden neutral undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Bronze rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Creamy Bronzing Powder in 120 sunbathed dune, against Haus Labs Power Sculpt Velvet Talc-Free Powder Bronzer in Amber Horizon Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmber Horizon MediumClosest shade match120 sunbathed duneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%92#a0624e#a2664eVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth25%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 80/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Forever Nude Bronze in 40 Deep Matte, against Haus Labs Power Sculpt Velvet Talc-Free Powder Bronzer in Amber Horizon Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmber Horizon MediumClosest overall alternative40 Deep MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%94#a0624e#9f6149Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth25%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $24 more
