Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Mocha 11 dupes and alternatives Hourglass
4.2 (5,208)·Deep · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
44
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral to golden undertones
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle brown undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
90
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle red undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with warm golden undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Same full coverage· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
33
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
The closest shade to Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer Mocha 11 (Deep · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix 36HR Smooth Angles Hydrating Concealer in NC55, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Mocha 11. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMocha 11Closest shade matchNC55How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%93#8f5529#8e542eVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Overall match 80/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 53G deep golden, against Hourglass Vanish Airbrush Full Coverage Longwear Concealer in Mocha 11. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMocha 11Closest overall alternative53G deep goldenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%79#8f5529#975835Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 2.8
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 80/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$9 less (23%)
