CC+ Airbrush Perfecting Powder Foundation Fair dupes and alternatives IT Cosmetics
3.9 (592)·Very fair
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: very fair with cool undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: most fair with cool undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: fair to light with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: most fair with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: fair to light with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than full coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
The closest shade to IT Cosmetics CC+ Airbrush Perfecting Powder Foundation Fair (Very fair) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Sephora Collection Best Skin Ever Liquid Foundation in 02P, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Airbrush Perfecting Powder Foundation in Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFairClosest shade match02PHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%99#fde7d9#ffe9dbLooks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
R.E.M. Beauty Sweetener Foundation in fair 2 n, against IT Cosmetics CC+ Airbrush Perfecting Powder Foundation in Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFairClosest overall alternativefair 2 nHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%94#fde7d9#ffe5d4Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared73
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%80FullBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than full (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveCombinationBoth marketed for combination skin
Overall match 83/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.