Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 44 Medium dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with warm undertone and olive undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium wth warm undertone and olive undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
$55Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (2%)4.3 (1,998)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
76
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for medium skintones with neutral olive undertones
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (48%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium light-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (48%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium/Tan with Neutral Undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep shade with cool undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium light-deep shade, golden undertone
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 44 Medium (Tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Hourglass Veil Hydrating Skin Tint Foundation in 13, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 44 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade44 MediumClosest match13How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#b5815a#b5825bLooks identicalColour difference 0.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanMedium tanCloseDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 89/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.