Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 48 Medium dupes and alternatives Jane Iredale
4.3 (618)·Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
85
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep shade with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim colour stability
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same buildable coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
57
Wear & performance
70
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium-deep shade, golden undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium skin with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Light rather than buildable coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Golden Undertones
$12.59$17.99Ulta Beauty$43.41 less (78%)4.2 (8,852)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
63
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$27 less (48%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim colour stability · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium/Tan with Neutral Undertones
The closest shade to Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation 48 Medium (Tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Gucci 24 Hour Full Coverage Luminous Matte Finish Foundation in 450O, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 48 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade48 MediumClosest shade match450OHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%94#af7a4f#b0774eVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 75/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Ambient Soft Glow Foundation in 11.5, against Jane Iredale Skintuition SPF 30 Radiance-Boosting Liquid Foundation in 48 Medium. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade48 MediumClosest overall alternative11.5How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%94#af7a4f#af764bVery close colourColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98TanTanSameDepth difference: 1.5
Retailer descriptionMediumMedium tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 84/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.