Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than taupe· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than taupe · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.8 (590)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Shimmer · Buildable
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Mauve rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Differences: Golden rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Golden rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light champagne gold with silver sparkle
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (43%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
IT Cosmetics Superhero No-Tug Longwear Eyeshadow Stick in Transformative Taupe, against Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Chandni Raat. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChandni RaatClosest shade matchTransformative TaupeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#ae8b85#a78681Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumLightCloseDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall26
Finish65%0GlitterMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than glitter
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Wink Dazzle Dual-Ended Eyeshadow Stick in Mocha Sparkle, against Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Chandni Raat. Matched on the deeper eyeshadow pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChandni RaatClosest overall alternativeMocha SparkleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%66#ae8b85#a98473Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared78
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
34 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$5 less (17%)
