Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: sparkling deep brown with red pearl
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Purple rather than rose· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Purple rather than rose · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.8 (590)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than rose· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than rose · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: crushed pearl (shimmer), cool khaki, brown sugar
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than rose· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than rose · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Berry rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Berry rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Metallic · Buildable
Differences: Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Copper rather than rose· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Copper rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than rose · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Terracotta rather than rose · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in GLEAMWOOD, against Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Sitara Sparkles. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSitara SparklesClosest shade matchGLEAMWOODHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour60%89#875556#845a5bVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
R.E.M. Beauty Starlet Liquid Eyeshadow in Siren, against Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Sitara Sparkles. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSitara SparklesClosest overall alternativeSirenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%68#875556#8a4853Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 79/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $4 more
