Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (77%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Taupe rather than plum· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Taupe rather than plum · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: golden metallic taupe with rich tawny shimmer/ holographic blushed gold with shifts of silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Powder rather than cream (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than plum · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering taupe with silver, pink & gold sparkle / a neutral taupe
Differences: Brown rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than plum · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool neutral with silver pearl
Differences: Nude rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Nude rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Nude rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (50%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than plum· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than plum · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne with icy blue sparkle
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than plum· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than plum · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: taupe metallic with warm silvery shimmer/
holographic foil with shifts of pink, silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than plum· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than plum · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: duochrome mauve taupe with blue reflects
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than plum· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than plum · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than plum· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Rose rather than plum · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
96
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than plum · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than plum· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown rather than plum · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (43%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Purple rather than plum· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Purple rather than plum · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Smolder, against Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Plum Pataka. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePlum PatakaClosest shade matchSmolderHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%85#c2a0a0#bc9697Close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89LightMediumCloseDepth difference 4.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 76/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Blossom, against Kulfi Zari Eyes Long-Lasting Crease-Proof Cream Eyeshadow in Plum Pataka. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePlum PatakaClosest overall alternativeBlossomHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%95#c2a0a0#c29d9bLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 77/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.50 less (65%)
Sephora
