Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Brown / nude rather than peach· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Brown / nude rather than peach · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than peach· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Brown / nude rather than peach · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Apricot rather than peach· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Apricot rather than peach · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Retailer shade note: soft cinnamon sparked with sweet pink
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Terracotta rather than peach · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
ONE/SIZE Cheek Clapper 3D Blush Trio Palette in Very That, against Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 217 Miel Glace. Matched on the blush pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade217 Miel GlaceClosest shade matchVery ThatHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%89#da927c#d2937aVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall63
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Dolci Blush Smoothing Cream-to-Powder Soft-Matte Balm in 2, Caramel Blush, against Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 217 Miel Glace. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade217 Miel GlaceClosest overall alternative2, Caramel BlushHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour55%95#da927c#df967eLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 85/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $2 more
