Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush 500 Ôh La La Pink dupes and alternatives Lancôme
4.7 (1,264)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$23 less (68%)4.5 (32,188)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Same skin types: combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: soft baby pink with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format)
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Claims comfort
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: sheer· Claims comfort
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than pink · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush 24H Buildable Powder Blush in 87 Pink Voltage, against Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 500 Ôh La La Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade500 Ôh La La PinkClosest shade match87 Pink VoltageHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%93#fb9ab5#fd97aeVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall60
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared53
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 53 Bold Pink, against Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 500 Ôh La La Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade500 Ôh La La PinkClosest overall alternative53 Bold PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%91#fb9ab5#ef9ab4Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall91
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format25%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $6 more
Ulta Beauty
