Infallible Full Wear Waterproof Concealer 360 Cashmere dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.2 (1,617)·Fair
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish· Medium-full rather than full coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than matte finish · Medium-full rather than full coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: fairest with pink/neutral undertones
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Infallible Full Wear Waterproof Concealer 360 Cashmere (Fair) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer in 0W1, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Full Wear Waterproof Concealer in 360 Cashmere. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade360 CashmereClosest shade match0W1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%98#f6cfb0#f5ceb1Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionNot statedVery fairNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared58
Finish35%56MatteNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than matte
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%6024-hour wear16-hour wearSome difference16-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; your product does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedDry, normal, combination, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 4.5 Fair-Medium, against L'Oréal Paris Infallible Full Wear Waterproof Concealer in 360 Cashmere. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade360 CashmereClosest overall alternative4.5 Fair-MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%87#f6cfb0#eecaa6Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95FairFairSameDepth difference: 3.0
Retailer descriptionNot statedFairNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $14.01 more
