Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint 410 Cool dupes and alternatives L'Oréal Paris
4.0 (2,301)·Rich deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: rich deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: dark deep with neutral undertone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: very deep with rosy undertones
The closest shade to L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint 410 Cool (Rich deep · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Too Faced Born This Way Soft Matte Foundation in Sable, against L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in 410 Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade410 CoolClosest shade matchSableHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#612d13#642c12Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 78/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Naked Sundays BeautyScreen Peptide Foundation Tint SPF 50 in Shade 9.6, against L'Oréal Paris Lumi Le Glow Skin Tint in 410 Cool. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade410 CoolClosest overall alternativeShade 9.6How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%88#612d13#61321eVery close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 90/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $34.51 more
